Chapter no 1

Between the World and Me

Do not speak to me ofmartyrdom, of men who die to be remembered on some parish day.

I don’t believe in dying though, I too shall die. And violets like castanets will echo me.

SONIA SANCHEZ

Son,

Last Sunday the host of a popular news show asked me what it meant to lose my body. The host was broadcasting from Washington, D.C., and I was seated in a remote stu dio on the far west side of Manhattan. A satellite closed the miles between us, but no machinery could close the gap between her world and the world for which I had been summoned to speak. W hen the host asked me about my body, her face faded from the screen, and was replaced by a scroll of words, written by me earlier that week.

The host read these words for the audience, and when she finished she turned to the subject of my body, al though she did not mention it specifically. But by now I am accustomed to intelligent people asking about the condition of my body without realizing the nature of their request. Specifically, the host wished to know why I felt

that white America’s progress, or rather the progress of those Americans who believe that they are white, was built on looting and violence. Hearing this, I felt an old and indistinct sadness well up in me. The answer to this ques tion is the record of the believers themselves. The answer is American history.

There is nothing extreme in this statement. Americans deify democracy in a way that allows for a dim awareness that they have, from time to time, stood in defiance of their God. But democracy is a forgiving God and Amer ica’s heresies-torture, theft, enslavement-are so common among individuals and nations that none can declare them selves immune. In fact, Americans, in a real sense, have

never betrayed their God. W hen Abraham Lincoln de clared, in 1863, that the battle of Gettysburg must ensure “that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth,” he was not merely

being aspirational; at the onset of the Civil War, the United States of America had one of the highest rates of suffrage in the world. The question is not whether Lincoln truly meant “government of the people” but what our country

has, throughout its history, taken the political term “peo ple” to actually mean. In 1863 it did not mean your mother or your grandmother, and it did not mean you and me. Thus America’s problem is not its betrayal of “government

of the people,” but the means by which “the people” ac quired their names.

This leads us to another equally important ideal, one

that Americans implicitly accept but to which they make no conscious claim. Americans believe in the reality of

“race” as a defined, indubitable feature of the natural world. Racism-the need to ascribe bone-deep features to people and then humiliate, reduce, and destroy them inevitably follows from this inalterable condition. In this

way, racism is rendered as the innocent daughter of Mother

‘

Nature, and one is left to deplore the Middle Passage or

the Trail of Tears the way one deplores an earthquake, a tornado, or any other phenomenon that can be cast as be yond the handiwork of men.

But race is the child of racism, not the father. And the process of naming “the people” has never been a matter of genealogy and phy siognomy so much as one of hierarchy. Difference in hue and hair is old. But the belief in the pre eminence of hue and hair, the notion that these factors can correctly organize a society and that they signify deeper attributes, which are indelible-this is the new idea at the heart of these new people who have been brought up hope lessly, tragically, deceitfully, to believe that they are white.

These new people are, like us, a modern invention. But

unlike us, their new name has no real meaning divorced from the m;chinery of criminal power. The new people were something else before they were white-Catholic, Corsican, Welsh, Mennonite, Jewish-and if all our na tional hopes have any fulfilent, then they wil have to be something else again. Perhaps they will truly become American and create a nobler basis for their myths. I can-

not call it. As for now, it must be said that the process of washing the disparate tribes white, the elevation of the belief in being white, was not achieved through wine tast ings and ice cream socials, but rather through the pillaging of life, liberty, labor, and land; through the flaying of backs; the chaining of limbs; the strangling of dissidents; the de struction of families; the rape of mothers; the sale of chil dren; and various other acts meant, first and foremost, to deny you and me the right to secure and govern our own bodies.

The new people are not original in this. Perhaps there has been, at some point in history, some great power whose elevation was exempt from the violent exploitation of other human bodies. If there has been, I have yet to dis cover it. But this banality of violence can never excuse America, because America makes no claim to the banal. America believes itself exceptional, the greatest and no blest nation ever to exist, a lone champion standing be tween the white city of democracy and the terrorists, despots, barbarians, and other enemies of civilization. One cannot, at once, claim to be superhuman and then plead mortal error. I propose to take our countrymen’s claims of American exceptionalism seriously, which is to say I pro pose subjecting our country to an exceptional moral stan dard. This is difficult because there exists, all around us, an apparatus urging us to accept American innoc�nce at face value and not to inquire too much. And it is so easy to look away, to live with the fruits of our history and to ig-

nore the great evil ·done in al of our names. But you and I have never truly had that luxury. I think you know.

I write you in your fifteenth year. I am writing you be cause this was the year you saw Eric Garner choked to death for selling cigarettes; because you know now that Renisha McBride was shot for seeking help, that John Crawford was shot down for browsing in a department store. And you have seen men in uniform drive by and murder Tamir Rice, a twelve-year-old child whom they were oath-bound to protect. And you have seen men in the same uniforms pummel Marlene Pinnock , someone’s grandmother, on the side of a road. And you know now, if you did not before, that the police departments of your country have been endowed with the authority to destroy your body. It does not matter if the destruction is the result of an unfortunate overreaction. It does not matter if it originates in a misunderstanding. It does not matter if the destruction springs from a foolish policy. Sell cigarettes without the proper authority and your body can be de stroyed. Resent the people trying to entrap your body and it can be destroyed. Turn into a dark stairwell and your body can be destroyed. T he destroyers will rarely be held accountable. Mostly they wil receive pensions. And de struction is merely the superlative form of a dominion whose prerogatives include friskings, detainings, beatings, and humiliations. Al of this is common to black people. And al of this is old for black people. No one is held re sponsible.

There is nothing uniquely evil in these destroyers or even in this moment. The destroyers are merely men en forcing the whims of our country, correctly interpreting its heritage and legacy . It is hard to face this. But all our phrasing-race relations, racial chasm, racial justice, racial profiling, white privilege, even white supremacy-serves to obscure that racism is a visceral experience, that it dis lodges brains, blocks airways, rips muscle, extracts organs, cracks bones, breaks teeth. You must never look away from this. You must always remember that the sociology, the history, the economics, the graphs, the charts, the regres sions all land, with great violence, upon the body.

That Sunday, with that host, on that news show, I tried

to explain this as best I could within the time allotted. But at the end of the segment, the host flashed a widely shared picture of an eleven-year-old black boy tearfuly hugging a white police officer. Then she asked me about “hope.” And I knew then that I had failed. And I remembered that I had expected to fail. And I wondered again at the indis tinct sadness welling up in me. Why exactly was I sad? I came out of the studio and walked for a while. It was a calm December day. Families, believing themselves white, were out on the streets. Infants, raised to be white, were bundled in strollers. And I was sad for these people, much as I was sad for the host and sad for all the people out there watching and reveling in a specious hope. I realized then why I was sad. When the journalist asked me about my body, it was like she was asking me to awaken her from the

most gorgeous dream. I have seen that dream al my life. It is perfect houses with nice lawns. It is Memorial Day cookouts, block associations, and driveways. The Dream is treehouses and the Cub Scouts. The Dream smells like peppermint but tastes like strawberry shortcake. And for so long I have wanted to escape into the Dream, to fold my country over my head like a blanket. But this has never been an option because the Dream rests on our backs, the bedding made from our bodies. And knowing this, know

ing that the Dream persists by warring with the known world, I was sad for the host, I was sad for al those families, I was sad for my country, but above al, in that moment, I

was sad for you.

That was the week you learned that the killers of Mi chael Brown would go free. The men who had left his body in the street like some awesome declaration of their inviolable power would never be punished. It was not my expectation that anyone would ever be punished. But you were young and still believed. You stayed up till 11 P.M. that night, waiting for the announcement of an indict ment, and when instead it was announced that there was none you said, “I’ve got to go,” and you went into your room, and I heard you crying. I came in five minutes after, and I didn’t hug you, and I didn’t comfort you, because I thought it would be wrong to comfort you. I did not tell you that it would be okay, because I have never believed it would be okay. What I told you is what your grandparents tried to tell me: that this is your country; that this is your

world, that this is your body, and you must find some way to live within the al of it. I tell you now that the question of how one should live within a black body, within a country lost in the Dream, is the question of my life, and the pursuit of this question, I have found, ultimately an swers itself.

This must seem strange to you. We live in a “goal oriented” era. Our media vocabulary is full of hot takes, big ideas, and grand theories of everything. But some time ago I rejected magic in al its forms. This rejection was a gift from your grandparents, who never tried to console me with ideas of an afterlife and were skeptical of preor dained American glory. In accepting both the chaos of his tory and the fact of my total end, I was freed to truly consider how I wished to live-specifically, how do I live free in this black body? It is a profound question because America understands itself as God’s handiwork, but the black body is the clearest evidence that America is the work of men. I have asked the question through my read ing and writings, through the music of my youth, through arguments with your grandfather, with your mother, your aunt Janai, your uncle Ben. I have searched for answers in nationalist 1nyth, in classrooms, out on the streets, and on other continents. The question is unanswerable, which is not to say futile. The greatest reward of this constant inter rogation, of confrontation with the brutality 9£ my coun try, is that it has freed me from ghosts and girded me against the sheer terror of disembodiment.

And I am afraid. I feel the fear most acutely whenever you leave me. But I was afraid long before you, and in this I was unoriginal. W hen I was your age the only people I knew were black, and all of them were power:fuly, ada mantly, dangerously afraid. I had seen this fear all my young life, though I had not always recognized it as such.

It was always right in front of me. The fear was there in the extravagant boys of my neighborhood,,in their large rings and medallions, their big puffy coats and full-length fur-collared leathers, which was their armor against their world. They would stand on the corner of Gwynn Oak and Liberty, or Cold Spring and Park Heights, or outside Mondawmin Mall, with their hands dipped in Russell sweats. I think back on those boys now and all I see is fear, and all I see is them girding themselves against the ghosts of the bad old days when the Mississippi mob gathered ’round their grandfathers so that the branches of the black body might be torched, then cut away. The fear lived on in their practiced bop, their slouching denim, their big T-shirts, the calculated angle of their baseball caps, a cata log of behaviors and garments enlisted to inspire the belief that these boys were in firm possession of everything they desired.

I saw it in their customs of war. I was no older than five, sitting out on the front steps of my home on Woodbrook Avenue, watching two shirtless boys circle each other close and buck shoulders. From then on, I knew that there was a ritual to a street fight, bylaws and codes that, in their very

need, attested to al the vulnerability of the black teenage bodies.

I heard the fear in the first music I ever knew, the music that pumped from boom boxes full of grand boast and bluster. The boys who stood out on Garrison and Liberty up on Park Heights loved this music because it told them, against al evidence and odds, that they were masters of their own lives, their own streets, and their own bodies. I saw it in the girls, in their loud laughter, in their gilded bamboo earrings that announced their names thrice over. And I saw it in their brutal language and hard gaze, how they would cut you with their eyes and destroy you with their words for the sin of playing too much. “Keep my name out your mouth;’ they would say. I would watch them after school, how they squared off like boxers, vas elined up, earrings off, Reeboks on, and leaped at each other.

I felt the fear in the visits to my Nana’s home in Phila delphia. You never knew her. I barely knew her, but what I remember is her hard manner, her rough voice. And I knew that my father’s father was dead and that my uncle Oscar was dead and that my uncle David was dead and that each of these instances was unnatural. And I saw it in my own father, who loves you, who counsels you, who slipped me money to care for you. My father was so very

afraid. I felt it in the sting of his black leather belt, which he applied with more anxiety than anger, my father who beat me as if someo�e might steal me away, because that is

exactly what was happening all around us. Ever yone had lost a child, somehow, to the streets, to jail, to drugs, to guns. It was said that these lost girls were sweet as honey and would not hurt a fly. It was said that these lost boys had just received a GED and had begun to turn their lives around. And now they were gone,and their legacy was a great fear.

Have they told you this story? When your grandmother was sixteen years old a young manknocked on her door. The young man was your Nana Jo’s boyfriend. No one else was home. Ma allowed this young man to sit and wait until your Nana Jo returned. But your great-grandmother got there first. She asked the young man to leave. Then she beat your grandmother terrifically, one last time, so that she might remember how easily she could lose her body. Ma never forgot. I remember her clutching my small hand tightly as we crossed the street. She would tell me that iflever let go and were killed by an onrushing car,she would beat me back to life. When I wassix, Ma and Dad took me to a local park. I slipped from their gaze and found a playground. Your grandparents spent anxious minutes looking for .me. When they found me,Dad did what every parent I knew would have done–he reached for his belt. I remember watching him in a kind of daze, awed at the distance between punishment and offense. Later, I would hear it in Dad’s voice-“Either I can beat him,or the police.” Maybe that saved me. Maybe it didn’t. Al I know is,the violence rose from the fear like smoke

from a fire, and I cannot say whether that violence, even administered in fear and love, sounded the alarm or choked us at the exit. W hat I know is that fathers who slammed their teenage boys for sass would then release them to streets where their boys employed, and were subject to, the same justice. And I knew mothers who belted their girls, but the belt could not save these girls from drug dealers twice their age. We, the children, employed our darkest humor to cope. We stood in the alley where we shot bas ketballs through hollowed crates and cracked jokes on the boy whose mother wore him out with a beating in front of his entire fifth-grade class. We sat on the number five bus, headed downtown, laughing at some girl whose mother was known to reach for anything—cable wires, extension cords, pots, pans. We were laughing, but I know that we were afraid of those who loved us most. Our par ents resorted to the lash the way flagellants in the plague years resorted to the scourge.

To be black in the Baltimore of my youth was to be naked before the elements of the world, before all the guns, fists, knives, crack, rape, and disease. The nakedness is not an error, nor pathology. The nakedness is the cor rect and intended result of policy, the predictable upshot of people forced for centuries to live under fear. The law did not protect us. And now; in your time, the law has be come an excuse for stopping and frisking you, which is to say, for furthering the assault on your body. But a society that protects some people through a safety net of schools,

government-backed home loans,and ancestral wealth but can only protect you with the club of cri minal justice has either failed at enforcing its good intentions or has suc ceeded at something much darker. However you call it, the result was our infir mity before the criminal forces of the world. It does not matter if the agent of those forces is white or black-what matters is our condition,what mat ters is the system that makes your body breakable.

The revelation of these forces,a series of great changes, has unfolded over the course of my life. The changes are still unfolding and will likely continue until I die. I was eleven years old,standing out in the parking lot in front of the 7-Eleven,watching a crew of older boys standing near the street. They yelled and gestured at …who?…another boy, young, like me, who stood there, almost smiling, gamely throwing up his hands. He had already learned the lesson he would teach me that day: that his body was in constant jeopardy. Who knows what brought him to that knowledge? The projects, a drunken stepfather,an older brother concussed by police, a cousin pinned in the city jail. That he was outnumbered did not matter because the whole world had outnumbered him long ago,and what do numbers matter? This was a war for the possession of his body and that would be the war of his whole life.

I stood there for some seconds, mar veling at the older boys’ beautiful sense of fashion. They all wore ski jackets, the kind which,in my day,mothers put on layaway in Sep-

tember, then piled up overtime hours so as to have the thing wrapped and ready for Christmas. I focused in on a light-skinned boy with a long head and small eyes. He was scowling at another boy, who was standing close to me. It wasjust before three in the afternoon. I was in sixth grade. School had just let out, and it was not yet the fighting weather of early spring. What was the exact problem here? Who could know?

The boy with the small eyes reached into his ski jacket

and pulled out a gun. I recall it in the slowest motion, as though in a dream. There the boy stood, with the gun brandished, which he slowly untucked, tucked, then un tucked once more, and in his small eyes I saw a surging rage that could, in an instant, erase my body. That was 1986. That year I felt myself to be drowning in the news reports of murder. I was aware that these murders very

often did not land upon the intended targets but fell upon great-aunts, PTA mothers, overtime uncles, and joyful children-fell upon them random and relentless, like great sheets of rain. I knew this in theory but could not under stand it as fact until the boy with the small eyes stood across from me holding my entire body in his small hands. The boy did not shoot. His friends pulled him back. He did not need to shoot. He had affirmed my place in the order of things. He had let it be known how easily I could be selected. I took the subway home that day, processing the episode all alone. I did not tell my parents. I did not tell

my teachers, and if! told my friends I would have done so with all the excitement needed to obscure the fear that came over me in that moment.

I remember being amazed that death could so easily rise up from the nothing of a boyish afternoon, billow up like fog. I knew that West Baltimore, where I lived; that the north side of Philadelphia, where my cousins lived; that the South Side of Chicago, where friends of my father lived, comprised a world apart. Somewhere out there be yond the firmament, past the asteroid belt, there were other worlds where children did not regularly fear for their bodies. I knew this because there was a large televi sion resting in my living room. In the evenings I would sit

before this television bearing witness to the dispatches from this other world. There were little white boys with complete collections of football cards, and their only want was a popular girlfriend and their only worry was poison oak. That other world was suburban and endless, organized around pot roasts, blueberry pies, fireworks, ice cream sun daes, immaculate bathrooms, and small toy trucks that were loosed in wooded backyards with streams and glens. Comparing these dispatches with the facts of my native world, I came to understand that my country was a galaxy, and this galaxy stretched from the pandemonium of West

Baltimore to the happy hunting grounds of Mr. Belvedere. I

obsessed over the distance between that other sector of space and my own. I knew that my portion of the Ameri can galaxy, where bodies were enslaved by a tenacious

gravity, was black and that the other, liberated portion was not. I knew that some inscrutable energy preserved the breach. I felt, but did not yet understand, the relation be tween that other world and me. And I felt in this a cosmic injustice, a profound cruelty, which infused an abiding, ir repressible desire to unshackle my body and achieve the velocity of escape.

Do you ever feel that same need? Your life is so very different from my own. The grandness of the world, the real world, the whole world, is a known thing for you. And you have no need of dispatches because you have seen so much of the American galaxy and its inhabitants their homes, their hobbies-up close. I don’t know what it means to grow up with a black president, social networks, omnipresent media, and black women everywhere in their natural hair. What I know is that when they loosed the killer of Michael Brown, you said, “I’ve got to go.” And that cut me because, for all our differing worlds, at your age my feeling was exactly the same. And I recall that even then I had not yet begun to imagine the perils that tangle us. You still believe the injustice was Michael Brown. You have not yet grappled with your own myths and narratives and discovered the plunder every where around us.

Before I could discover, before I could escape, I had to

survive, and this could only mean a clash with the streets, by which I mean not just physical blocks, nor simply the people packed into them, but the array of lethal puzzles and strange perils that seem to rise up from the asphalt it-

self. The streets transform every ordinary day into a series of trick questions, and every incorrect answer risks a beat down, a shooting, or a pregnancy. No one survives un scathed. And yet the heat that springs from the constant danger, from a lifesty le of near-death experience, is thril ing. This is what the rappers mean when they pronounce themselves addicted to “the streets” or in love with “the game:’ I imagine they feel something akin to parachutists, rock climbers, BASE jumpers, and others who choose to live on the edge. Of course we chose nothing. And I have never believed the brothers who claim to “run,” much less “own,” the city. We did not design the streets. We do not fund them. We do not preserve them. But I was there, nevertheless, charged like al the others with the protec tion of my body.

The crews, the young men who’d transmuted their fear into rage, were the greatest danger. The crews walked the blocks of their neighborhood, loud and rude, because it was only through their loud rudeness that they might feel any sense of security and power. They would break your jaw, stomp your face, and shoot you down to feel that power, to revel in the might of their own bodies. And their wild reveling, their astonishing acts made their names ring out. Reps were made, atrocities recounted. And so in my Baltimore it was known that when Cherry Hil rolled through you rolled the other way, that North and Pulaski was not an intersection but a hurricane, leaving only splin ters and shards in its wake. In that fashion, the security of

these neighborhoods flowed downward and became the security of the bodies living there. You steered clear ofJo Jo, for instance, because he was cousin to Keon, the don of Murphy Homes. In other cities, indeed in other Balti mores, the neighborhoods had other handles and the boys went by other names, but their mission did not change: prove the inviolability of their block, of their bodies, through their power to crack knees, ribs, and arms. This practice was so common that today you can approach any black person raised in the cities ofthat era and they can tell you which crew ran which hood in their city; and they can tell you the names of all the captains and all their cousins and offer an anthology of all their exploits.

To survive the neighborhoods and shield my body, I learned another language consisting of a basic comple ment of head nods and handshakes. I memorized a list of prohibited blocks. I learned the smell and feel of fighting weather. And I learned that “Shorty, can I see your bike?” was never a sincere question, and “Yo, you was messing with my cousin” was neither an earnest accusation nor a misunderstanding ofthe facts. These were the summonses that you answered with your left foot forward, your right foot back, your hands guarding your face, one slightly lower than the other, cocked like a hamer. Or they were answered by breaking out, ducking through alleys, cutting through backyards, then bounding through the door past your kid brother into your bedroom, pulling the tool out of your lambskin or from under your mattress or out of

your Adidas shoebox, then calling up your own cousins (who really aren’t) and returning to that same block, on that same day, and to that same crew, hollering out, “Yeah, nigger, what’s up now?” I recall learning these laws clearer than I recall learning my colors and shapes, because these laws were essential to the security of my body.

I think of this as a great difference between us.You have some acquaintance with the old rules, but they are not as essential to you as they were to me. I am sure that you have had to deal with the occasional roughneck on the subway or in the park, but when I was about your age, each day, fully one-third of my brain was concerned with who I was walking to school with, our precise number, the manner of our walk, the number of times I smiled, who or what I smiled at, who offered a pound and who did not-all of which is to say that I practiced the culture of the streets, a culture concerned chiefly with securing the body.I do not long for those days.I have no desite to make you “tough” or “street,” perhaps because any “toughness” I garnered came reluctantly. I think I was always, somehow, aware of the price.I think I somehow knew that that thitd of my brain should have been concerned with more beautiful things. I think I felt that something out there, some force, nameless and vast, had robbed me of … what? Titne? Ex perience? I think you know something of what that third could have done, and I think that is why you may feel the need for escape even more than I did. You have seen all the wonderful life up above the tree-line, yet you under-

stand that there is no real distance between you and Tray von Martin, and thus Trayvon Martin must terrify you in a way that he could never terrify me. You have seen so much more of’ all that is lost when they destroy your body. The streets were· not my only problem. If the streets shackled my right leg, the schools shackled my left. Fail to comprehend the streets and you gave up your body now. But fail to comprehend the schools and you gave up your body later. I suffered at the hands of both, but I resent the schools more. There was nothing sanctified about the laws of the streets-the laws were amoral and practical. You rolled with a posse to the party as sure as you wore boots in the snow, or raised an umbrella in the rain. These were rules aimed at something obvious-the great danger that haunted every visit to Shake & Bake, every bus ride down town. But the laws of the schools were aimed at something distant and vague. What did it mean to, as our elders told us, “grow up and be somebody”? And what precisely did this have to do with an education rendered as rote dis cipline? To be educated in my Baltimore mostly meant always packing an extra nnmber 2 pencil and working qui etly. Educated children walked in single file on the right side of the hallway, raised their hands to use the lavatory, and carried the lavatory pass when en route. Educated children never offered excuses-certainly not childhood itself. The world had no time for the childhoods of black boys and girls. How could the schools? Algebra, Biology, and English were not subjects so much as opportunities to

better discipline the body, to practice writing between the lines, copying the directions legibly, memorizing theorems extracted from the world they were created to represent. Al of it felt so distant to me. I remember sitting in my seventh-grade French class and not having any idea why I was there. I did not know any French people, and noth ing around me suggested I ever would. France was a rock rotating in another galaxy, around another sun, in another sky that I would never cross. Why, precisely, was I sitting in this classroom?

The question was never answered. I was a curious boy, but the schools were not concerned with curiosity. They were concerned with compliance. I loved a few of my teachers. But I cannot say that I truly believed any of them. Some years after I’d left school, after I’d dropped out of college, I heard a few lines from Nas that struck me:

Ecstasy, coke, you say it’s love, it is poison

Schools where I learn they should be burned, it is poison

That was exactly how I felt back then. I sensed the schools were hiding something, drugging us with false morality so that we would not see, so that we did not ask: Why -for us and only us-is the other side of free will and free spirits an assault upon our bodies? This is not a hy perbolic concern. When our elders presented school to us, they did not present it as a place of high learning but as a means of escape from death and penal warehousing.

Fully 60 percent of all young black men who drop out of high school will go to jail. This should disgrace the coun try. But it does not, and while I couldn’t crunch the num bers or plumb the history back then, I sensed that the fear that marked West Baltimore could not be explained by the schools. Schools did not reveal truths, they concealed them. Perhaps they must be burned away so that the heart of this thing might be known.

Unfit for the schools, and in good measure wanting to be unfit for them, and lacking the savvy I needed to master the streets, I felt there could be no escape for me or, hon estly, anyone else. The fearless boys and girls who would knuckle up, call on cousins and crews, and, if it came to it, pull guns seemed to have mastered the streets. But their knowledge peaked at seventeen, when they ventured out of their parents’ homes and discovered that America had guns and cousins, too. I saw their futures in the tired faces of mothers dragging themselves onto the 28 bus, swatting

and cursing a� three-year-olds; I saw their futures in the men out on the corner yelling obscenely at some young girl because she would not smile. Some of them stood outside liquor stores waiting on a few dollars for a bottle.

We would hand them a twenty and tell them to keep the change. They would dash inside and return with Red Bull, Mad Dog, or Cisco. Then we would walk to the house of someone whose mother worked nights, play “Fuck tha Police;’ and drink to our youth. We could not get out. The ground we walked was trip-wired. The air we breathed

was toxic. The water stunted our growth. We could not get out.

A year after I watched the boy with the small eyes pul out a gun, my father beat me for letting another boy steal from me. Two years later, he beat me for threatening my ninth-grade teacher. Not being violent enough could cost me my body. Being too violent could cost me my body. We could not get out. I was a capable boy, intelligent, well liked, but powerfully afraid. And I felt, vaguely, wordlessly, that for a child to be marked off for such a life, to be forced to live in fear was a great injustice. And what was the source of this fear? W hat was hiding behind the smoke screen of streets and schools? And what did it mean that number 2 pencils, conjugations without context, Pythago rean theorems, handshakes, and head nods were the differ ence between life and death, were the curtains drawing down between the world and me?

I could not retreat, as did so many, into the church and its mysteries. My parents rejected all dogmas. We spurned the holidays marketed by the people who wanted to be white. We would not stand for their anthems. We would not kneel before their God. And so I had no sense that any just God was on my side. “The meek shall inherit the earth” meant nothing to me. The meek were battered in West Baltimore, stomped out atWalbrookJunction, bashed up on Park Heights, and raped in the showers of the city

jail. My understanding of the universe was physical, and its moral arc bent toward chaos then concluded in a box.

That was the message ofthe small-eyed boy, untucking the piece- child bearing the power to body and banish other children to memory. Fear ruled everything around me, and I knew, as al black people do, that this fear was connected to the Dream out there, to the unworried boys, to pie and pot roast, to the white fences and green lawns nightly beamed into our television sets.

But how? Religion could not tell me. The schools could not tell me. The streets could not help me see be yond the scramble of each day. And I was such a curious boy. I was raised that way. Your grandmother taught me to read when I was only four. She also taught me to write, by which I mean not simply organizing a set ofsentences into a series of paragraphs, but organizing them as a means of investigation. When I was in trouble at school (which was quite often) she woul<:I make me write about it. The writ ing had to answer a series of questions: Why did I feel the need to talk at the same time as my teacher?Why did I not believe that my teacher was entitled to respect? How would I want someone to behave while I was talking? What would I do the next time I felt the urge to talk to my friends during a lesson? I have given you these same assignments. I gave them to you not because I thought they would curb your behavior-they certainly did not curb mine-but because these were the earliest acts of in terrogation, of drawing myself into consciousness. Your grandmother was not teaching me how to behave in class. She was teaching me how to ruthlessly interrogate the

subject that elicited the most sympathy and rationalizing mysel£ Here was the lesson: I was not an innocent. My impulses were not filled with unfailing virtue. And feeling that I was as human as anyone, this must be true for other humans. If I was not innocent, then they were not inno cent. Could this mix of motivation also affect the stories they tell? The cities they built? The country they claimed as given to them by God?

Now the questions began burning in me. The materials for research were al around me, in the form of books as sembled by your grandfather. He was then working at HowardUniversity as a research librarian in the Moorland Spingarn Research Center, one of the largest collections of Africana in the world. Your grandfather loved books and loves them to this day, and they were al over the house, books about black people, by black people, for black peo ple spilling off shelves and out of the living room, boxed up in the basement. Dad had been a local captain in the Black Panther Party. I read through al of Dad’s books about the Panthers and his stash of old Party newspapers. I was attracted to their guns, because the guns seemed hon est. The guns seemed to address this country, which in vented the streets that secured them with despotic police, in its primary language–violence. And I compared the Panthers to the heroes given to me by the schools, men and women who struck me as ridiculous and contrary to everything I knew.

Every February my classmates and I were herded into

assemblies for a ritual review of the Civil Rights Move ment. Our teachers urged us toward the example of free dom marchers, Freedom Riders, and Freedom Sumers, and it seemed that the month could not pass without a series of films dedicated to the glories of being beaten on camera. The black people in these films seemed to love the worst things in life–love the dogs that rent their chil dren apart, the tear gas that clawed at their lungs, the fire hoses that tore offtheir clothes and tumbled them into the streets. They seemed to love the men who raped them, the women who cursed them, love the children who spat on

them, the terrorists that bombed them. Why are they show

ing this to us? Why were only our heroes nonviolent? I speak not of the morality of nonviolence, but of the sense that blacks are in especial need of this morality. Back then al I could do was measure these freedom-lovers by what I

knew. Which is to say, I measured them against children

pulling out in the 7-Eleven parking lot, against parents wielding extension cords, and “Yeah, nigger, what’s up

now?” I judged them against the country I knew, which

had acquired the land through murder and tamed it under slavery, against the country whose armies fanned out across the world to extend their dominion. The world, the real one, was civilization secured and ruled by savage means. How could the schools valorize men and women whose values society actively scorned? How could they send us out into the streets of Baltimore, knowing al that they were, and then speak of nonviolence?

I came to see the streets and the schools as arms of the same beast. One enjoyed the official power of the state while the other enjoyed its implicit sanction. But fear and violence were the weaponry of both. Fail in the streets and the crews would catch you slipping and take your body. Fail in the schools and you would be suspended and sent back to those same streets, where they would take your body. And I began to see these two arms in relation those who failed in the schools justified their destruction in the streets. The society could say, “He should have stayed in school,” and then wash its hands of him.

It does not matter that the “intentions” of individual educators were noble. Forget about intentions. W hat any institution, or its agents, “intend” for you is secondary. Our world is physical. Learn to play defense-ignore the head and keep your eyes on the body. Very few Americans will directly proclaim that they are in favor of black people being left to the streets. But a very large number of Amer icans will do al they can to preserve the Dream. No one directly proclaimed that schools were designed to sanctify failure and destruction. But a great number of educators spoke of “personal responsibility” in a country authored and sustained by a criminal irresponsibility. The point of this language of “intention” and “personal responsibility” is broad exoneration. Mistakes were made. Bodies were broken. People were enslaved. We meant well. We tried our best. “Good intention” is a hall pass through history, a sleeping pill that ensures the Dream.

An unceasing interrogation of the stories told to us by the schools now felt essential. It felt wrong not to ask why, and then to ask it again. I took these questions to my fa ther, who very often refused to offer an answer, and instead referred me to more books. My mother and father were always pushing me away from secondhand answers-even the answers they themselves believed. I don’t know that I have ever found any satisfactory answers of my own. But every time I ask it, the question is refined. That is the best of what the old heads meant when they spoke of being “politically conscious”-as much a series of actions as a state of being, a constant questioning, questioning as ritual, questioning as exploration rather than the search for cer tainty. Some things were clear to me: The violence that undergirded the country, so flagrantly on display during Black History Month, and the intimate violence of “Yeah, nigger, what’s up now?” were not unrelated. And this vio lence was not magical, but was of a piece and by design.

But what exactly was the design? And why? I must

know. I must get out … but into what? I devoured the books because they were the rays of light peeking out from the doorframe, and perhaps past that door there was another world, one beyond the gripping fear that under girded the Dream.

In this blooming consciousness, in this period of intense questioning, I was not alone. Seeds planted in the 1960s, forgotten by so many, sprung up from the ground and bore fruit. Malcolm X, who’d been dead for twenty-five years,

exploded out qf the small gatherings of his surviving apos tles and returned to the world. Hip-hop artists quoted him in lyrics, cut his speeches across the breaks, or flashed his likeness in their videos. This was the early ’90s. I was then approaching the end of my time in my parents’ home and wondering about my life out there. If! could have chosen a flag back then, it would have been embroidered with a portrait of Malcolm X, dressed in a business suit, his tie dangling, one hand parting a window shade, the other holding a rifle. The portrait communicated everything I wanted to be-controlled, intelligent, and beyond the fear. I would buy tapes of Malcolm’s speeches-“Message to the Grassroots,” “The Ballot or the Bullet”–down at Everyone’s Place, a black bookstore on North Avenue, and play them on my Walkman. Here was all the angst I felt before the heroes of February, distilled and quotable. “Don’t give up your life, preserve your life,” he would say. “And if you got to give it up, make it even-steven.” This was not boasting-it was a declaration of equality rooted not in better angels or the intangible spirit but in the sanc tity of the black body. You preserved your life because your life, your body, was as good as anyone’s, because your blood was as precious as jewels, and it should never be sold for magic, for spirituals inspired by the unknowable here after. You do not give your precious body to the billy clubs of Birmingham sheriffs nor to the insidious gravity of the streets. Black is beautiful-which is to say that the black body is beautiful, that black hair must be guarded

ag;rinst the torture of processing and lye, that black skin must be guarded ag;rinst bleach, that our noses and mouths must be protected ag;rinst modern surgery. We are al our beautiful bodies and so must never be prostrate before bar barians, must never submit our original self, our one· of one, to defiling and plunder.

I loved Malcolm because Malcolm never lied, unlike the schools and their fa�ade of morality, unlike the streets and their bravado, unlike the world of dreamers. I loved him because he made it plain, never mystical or esoteric, be cause his science was not rooted in the actions of spooks and mystery gods but in the work ‘of the physical world. Malcolm was the first political pragmatist I knew, the first honest man I’d ever heard. He was unconcerned with mak ing the people who believed they were white comfortable in their belief. If he was angry, he s;rid so. If he hated, he hated because it was human for the enslaved to hate the enslaver, natural as Prometheus hating the birds. He would not turn the other cheek for you. He would not be a better man for you. He would not be your morality. Malcolm spoke like a man who was free, like a black man above the laws that proscribed our imagination. I identified with him. I knew that he had chafed ag;rinst the schools, that he had almost been doomed by the streets. But even more I knew that he had found himself while studying in prison, and that when he emerged from the j;rils, he returned wielding some old power that made him speak as though his body were his own. “If you’re black, you were born injw;· Mal-

colm said. And I felt the truth of this in the blocks I had to avoid, in the times of day when I must not be caught walk ing home from school, in my lack of control over my body. Perhaps I too might live free. Perhaps I too might wield the same old power that animated the ancestors, that lived in Nat Turner, Harriet Tubman, Nanny, Cudjoe, Malcolm X, and speak-no, act-as though my body were my own.

My reclamation would be accomplished, like Malcolm’s, through books, through my own study and exploration. Perhaps I might write something of consequence someday. I had been reading and writing beyond the purview of the schools all my life. Already I was scribbling down bad rap lyrics and bad poetry. T he air of that time was charged with the call for a return, to old things, to something es sential, some part of us that had been left behind in the mad dash out of the past and into America.

This missing thing, this lost essence, explained the boys on the corner and “the babies having babies.” It explained everything, from our cracked-out fathers to HIV to the bleached skin of Michael Jackson. The missing thing was related to the plunder of our bodies, the fact that any claim to ourselves, to the hands that secured us, the spine that braced us, and the head that directed us, was contestable.

T his was two years before the Million Man March. Al most every day I played Ice Cube’s album Death Certificate: “Let me live my life, if we can no longer live our life, then let us give our life for the liberation and salvation of the black nation.” I kept the Black Power episodes of Eyes on

the Prize in my weekly rotation. I was haunted by the shadow of my father’s generation, by Fred Hampton and Mark Clark. I was haunted by the bodily sacrifice of Mal colm, by Attica and Stokely. I was haunted because I be lieved that we had left ourselves back there, undone by COINTELPRO and black flight and drugs, and now in the crack era all we had were our fears. Perhaps we should go back. That was what I heard in the call to “keep it real.” Perhaps we should return to ourselves, to our own pri mordial streets, to our own ruggedness, to our own rude hair. Perhaps we should return to Mecca.

My only Mecca was, is, and shall always be Howard Uni versity. I have tried to explain this to you many times. You say that you hear me, that you understand, but I am not so sure that the force of my Mecca-The Mecca-can be translated into your new and eclectic tongue. I am not even sure that it should be. My work is to give you what I know of my own particular path while allowing you to walk your own. You can no more be black like I am black

than I could b� black like your grandfather was. And still, I maintain that even for a cosmopolitan boy like you, there

is something to be found there- base, even in these modern times, a port in the American storm. Surely I am biased by nostalgia and tradition. Your grandfather worked at Howard. Your uncles Darnani and Menelik and your aunts Kris and Kelly graduated from there. I met your

mother there, your uncle Ben, your aunt Kamilah and aunt Chana.

I was admitted to Howard University, but formed and shaped by The Mecca. These institutions are related but not the same. Howard University is an institution of higher education, concerned with the LSAT, magna cum laude, and Phi Beta Kappa. The Mecca is a machine, crafted to capture and concentrate the dark energy of all African peoples and inject it directly into the student body. The Mecca derives its power from the heritage of Howard Uni versity, which in Jim Crow days enjoyed a near-monopoly on black talent. And whereas most other historically black schools were scattered like forts in the great wilderness of the old Confederacy, Howard was in Washington, D.C. Chocolate City-and thus in proximity to both federal power and black power. The result was an alumni and professorate that spanned genre and generation-Charles Drew, Amiri Baraka, Thurgood Marshall, Ossie Davis, Doug W ilder, David Dinkins, Lucille Clifton, Toni Mor rison, Kwame Ture. The history, the location, the alumni combined to create The Mecca-the crossroads of the black diaspora.

I first witnessed this power out on the Yard, that com munal green space in the center of the campus where the students gathered and I saw everything I knew of my black self multiplied out into seemingly endless variations. There were the scions of Nigerian aristocrats in their business suits giving dap to bald-headed Qs in purple windbreakers

and tan Timbs. There were the high-yellow progeny of AME preachers debating the clerics of Ausar-Set. There were California girls turned Muslim, born anew, in hijab and long skirt. There were Ponzi schemers and Christian cultists, Tabernacle fanatics and mathematical geniuses. It was like listening to a hundred different renditions of “Redemption Song;’ each in a different color and key. And overlaying all of this was the history of Howard itself. I knew that I was literally walking in the footsteps of all the Toni Morrisons and Zora Neale Hurstons, of all the Sterling Browns and Kenneth Clarks, who’d come before. The Mecca-the vastness of black people across space time–could be experienced in a twenty-minute walk across campus. I saw this vastness in the students chopping it up in front of the Frederick Douglass Memorial Hall, where Muhammad Ali had addressed their fathers and mothers in defiance of the Vietnam War. I saw its epic sweep in the students next to Ira Aldridge Theater, where Donny Hathaway had once sung, where Donald Byrd had once assembled his flock. The students came out with their saxophones, trumpets, and drums, played “My Favor ite Things” or “Someday My Prince Will Come.” Some of the other students were out on the grass in front of Alain Locke Hall, in pink and green, chanting, singing, stomping, clapping, stepping. Some of them came up from Tubman Quadrangle with their roommates and rope for Double Dutch. Some of them came down from Drew Hall, with their caps cocked and their backpacks slung through one

arm, then fell into gorgeous ciphers ofbeatbox and rhyme. Some of the girls sat by the flagpole with bell hooks and Sonia Sanchez in their straw totes. Some of the boys, with their new Yoruba names, beseeched these girls by citing Frantz Farron. Some of them studied Russian. Some of them worked in bone labs. They were Panamanian. They were Bajan. And some of them were from places I had never heard of. But al of them were hot and incredible, exotic even, though we hailed from the same tribe.

The black world was expanding before me, and I could see now that that world was more than a photonegative of that of the people who believe they are white. “White America” is a syndicate arrayed to protect its exclusive power to dominate and control our bodies. Sometimes this power is direct (lynching), and sometimes it is insidious (redlining) . But however it appears, the power of domina tion and exclusion is central to the belief in being white, and without it, “white people” would cease to exist for want of reasons. There will surely always be people with straight hair and blue eyes, as there have been for al his tory. But some of these straight-haired people with blue eyes have been “b!ack;’ and this points to the great differ ence between their world and ours. We did not choose our fences. They were imposed on us byVirginia planters obsessed with enslaving as many Americans as possible. They are the ones who came up with a one-drop rule that separated the “white” from the “black,” even if it meant that their own blue-eyed sons would live under the lash.

The result is a people, black people, who embody al phys ical varieties and whose life stories mirror this physical range. Through The Mecca I saw that we were, in our own segregated body politic, cosmopolitans. The black di aspora was not just our own world but, in so many ways, the Western world itself.

Now, the heirs of those Virginia planters could never directly acknowledge this legacy or reckon with its power. And so that beauty that Malcolm pledged us to protect, black beauty, was never celebrated in movies, in television, or in the textbooks I’d seen as a child. Everyone of any import, fromJesus to George Washington, was white. This was why your grandparents banned Tarzan and the Lone Ranger and toys with white faces from the house. They were rebelling against the history books that spoke of black people only as sentimental “firsts”-first black five star general, first black congressman, first black mayor always presented in the bemused manner of a category of Trivial Pursuit. Serious history was the West, and the West was white. This was al distilled for me in a quote I once read from the novelist Saul Bellow. I can’t remember where I read it, or when-only that I was already at Howard. “Who is the Tolstoy of the Zulus?” Bellow quipped. Tol stoy was “white,” and so Tolstoy “mattered,” like everything else that was white “mattered:’ And this view of things was connected to the fear that passed through the generations, to the sense of dispossession. We were black, beyond the visible spectrum, beyond civilization. Our history was in-

ferior because we were inferior, which is to say our bodies were inferior. And our inferior bodies could not possibly be accorded the same respect as those that built the West. Would it not be better, then, if our bodies were civilized, improved, and put to some legitimate Christian use?

Contrary to this theory, I had Malcohu. I had my mother and father. I had my readings of every issue of The Source and Vibe. I read them not merely because I loved black

music–! did-but because of the writing itself. W riters Greg Tate, Chairman Mao, dream hampton-barely older than me-were out there creating a new language, one that I intuitively understood, to analyze our art, our world. This was, in and of itself, an argument for the weight and beauty of our culture and thus of our bodies. And now each day, out on the Yard, I felt this weight and saw this beauty, not just as a matter of theory but also as demonstrable fact. And I wanted desperately to communicate this evidence to the world, because I felt-even ifl did not completely know that the larger culture’s erasure of black beauty was inti mately connected to the destruction of black bodies .

What was required was a new story, a new history told through the lens of o·ur struggle. I had always known this, had heard the need for a new history in Malcohu, had seen

the need addressed in my father’s books. It was in the promise behind their grand titles-Children of the Sun, Wondeiful Ethiopians of the Andent Cushite Empire, The Afr ican Origin of Civilization. Here was not just our history

but the history of the world, weaponized to our noble

ends. Here was the primordial stuff of our own Dream the Dream of a “black race”-of our own Tolstoys who lived deep in the African past, where we authored operas, pioneered secret algebra, erected ornate walls, pyramids, colossi, bridges, roads, and al the inventions that I then thought must qualify one’s lineage for the ranks ofciviliza tion. They had their champions, and somewhere we must have ours. By then I’d read Chancellor Williams, J. A. Rogers, andJohn Jackson–writers central to the canon of our new noble history. From them I knew that Mansa Musa of Mali was black, and Shabaka ofEgypt was black, and Yaa Asantewaa of Ashanti was black-and “the black race” was a thing I supposed existed from time immemo rial, a thing that was real and mattered.

When I came to Howard, Chancellor Williams’s De

struction efBlack Civilization was my Bible. Williams him self had taught at Howard. I read him when I was sixteen, and his work offered a grand theory of multi-millennial European plunder. The theory relieved me of certain troubling questions-this is the point of nationalism-and it gave me my Tolstoy. I read about Queen Nzinga, who ruled in Central Africa in the sixteenth century, resisting the Portuguese. I read about her negotiating with the Dutch. When the Dutch ambassador tried to humiliate her by refusing her a seat, Nzinga had shown her power by ordering one of her advisers to al fours to make a human chair of her body. That was the kind of power I sought, and the story ofour own royalty became for me a weapon.

My working theory then held all black people as kings in exile, a nation of original men severed from our original names and our majestic Nubian culture. Surely this was the message I took from gazing out on the Yard. Had any people, anywhere, ever been as sprawling and beautiful as us?

I needed more books. At Howard University, one of the greatest collections of books could be found in the Moorland-Spingarn Research Center, where your grand father once worked. Moorland held archives, papers, col lections, and virtually any book ever written by or about black people. For the most significant portion of my time atThe Mecca, I followed a simple ritual. I would walk into the Moorland reading room and fill out three call slips for three different works. I would take a seat at one of these long tables. I would draw out my pen and one of my black-and-white composition books. I would open the books and read, while filng my COJ:1position books with notes on my reading, new vocabulary words, and sentences of my own invention. I would arrive in the morning and request, three call slips at a time, the works of every writer I had heard spoken ·of in classrooms or out on the Yard: Larry Neal, Eric Williams, George Padmore, Sonia San chez, Stanley Crouch, Harold Cruse, Manning Marable, Addison Gayle, Carolyn Rodgers, Etheridge Knight, Ster ling Brown. I remember believing that the key to all life lay in articulating the precise difference between “the Black Aesthetic” and “Negritude.” How, specifically, did

Europe underdevelop Africa? I must know. And if the Eighteenth Dynasty pharaohs were alive today, would they live in Harlem? I had to inhale al the pages.

I went into this investigation imagining history to be a unified narrative, free of debate, which, once uncovered, would simply verify everything I had always suspected. The smokescreen would lift. And the villains who ma nipulated the schools and the streets would be unmasked. But there was so much to know-so much geography to cover-Africa, the Caribbean, the Americas, the United States. And al of these areas had histories, sprawling liter ary canons, fieldwork, ethnographies. Where should I begin?

The trouble came almost immediately. I did not find a

coherent tradition marching lockstep but instead factions, and factions within factions. Hurston battled Hughes, Du Bois warred with Garvey, Harold Cruse fought everyone. I felt myself at the bridge of a great ship that I could not control because C.L.R. James was a great wave and Basil Davidson was a swirling eddy, tossing me about. Things I believed merely a week earlier, ideas I had taken from one book, could be smashed to splinters by another. Had we retained any of our African inheritance? Frazier says it was al destroyed, and this destruction evidences the terrible ness of our capturers. Herskovitz says it lives on, and this evidences the resilience of our African spirit. By my sec ond year, it was natural for me to spend a typical day me diating between Frederick Douglass’s integration into

America and Martin Delany’s escape into nationalism. Perhaps they were somehow both right. I had come look ing for a parade, for a military review ofchampions march ing in ranks. Instead I was left with a brawl of ancestors, a herd ofdissenters, sometimes marching together butjust as often marching away from each other.

I would take breaks from my reading, walk out to the vendors who lined the streets, eat lunch on the Yard. I would imagine Malcolm, his body bound in a cell, study ing the books, trading his human eyes for the power of flight. And I too felt bound by my ignorance, by the ques tions that I had not yet understood to be more than just means, by my lack of understanding, and by Howard itself. It was still a school, after all. I wanted to pursue things, to know things, but I could not match the means ofknowing that came naturally to me with the expectations of profes sors. The pursuit ofknowing was freedom to me, the right to declare your own curiosities and follow them through all manner of books. I was made for the library, not the classroom. The classroom was ajail ofother people’s inter ests. The library was open, unending, free. Slowly, I was discovering myself. The best parts ofMalcolm pointed the way. Malcolm, always changing, always evolving toward some truth that was ultimately outside the boundaries of his life, of his body. I felt myself in motion, still directed toward the total possession ofmy body, but by some other route which I could not before then have imagined.

I was not searching alone. I met your uncle Ben at The

Mecca. He was, like me, from one of those cities where everyday life was so different than the Dream that it de manded an explanation. He came, like me, to The Mecca in search of the nature and origin of the breach. I shared with him a healthy skepticism and a deep belief that we could somehow read our way out. Ladies loved him, and what a place to be loved-for it was said, and we certainly believed it to be true, that nowhere on the Earth could one find a more beautiful assembly of women than on Howard University’s Yard. And somehow even this was part of the search-the physical beauty of the black body was al our beauty, historical and cultural, incarnate. Your uncle Ben became a fellow traveler for life, and I discov ered that there was something particular about journeying out with black people who knew the length of the road because they had traveled it too.

I would walk out into the city and find other searchers at lectures, book signings, and poetry readings. I was still writing bad poetry. I read this bad poetry at open mies in local cafes populated mostly by other poets who also felt the insecurity of their bodies. Al of these poets were older and wiser than me, and many of them were well read, and they brought this wisdom to bear on me and my work.

What did I mean, specijically, by the loss of my body? And

ifevery black body was precious, a one of one, if Malcolm was correct and you must preserve your life, how could I see these precious lives as simply a collective mass, as the amorphous residue ofplunder? How could I privilege the

spectrum of dark energy over each particular ray oflight? These were notes on how to write, and thus notes on how to think. The Dream thrives on generalization, on limiting the number of possible questions, on privileging immedi ate answers. The Dream is the enemy of al art, courageous thinking, and honest writing. And it became clear that this was not just for the dreams concocted by Americans to justify themselves but also for the dreams that I had con jured to replace them. I had thought that I must mirror the outside world, create a carbon copy of white claims to civilization. It was beginning to occur to me to question the logic of the claim itself. I had forgotten my own self interrogations pushed upon me by my mother, or rather I had not yet apprehended their deeper, lifelong meaning. I was only beginning to learn to be wary of my own hu manity, ofmy own hurt and anger-I didn’t yet realize that the boot on your neck is just as likely to make you delu sional as it is to ennoble.

The art I was coming to love lived in this void, in the not yet knowable, in the pain, in the question. The older poets introduced . me to artists who pulled their energy from the void-Bubber Miley, Otis Redding, Sam and Dave, C. K. Williams, Carolyn Forche. The older poets were Ethelbert Miller, Kenneth Carroll, Brian Gilmore. It is important that I tell you their names, that you know that I have never achieved anything alone. I remember sitting with Joel Dias-Porter, who had not gone to Howard but whom I found at The Mecca, reviewing every line of

Robert Hayden’s “Middle Passage.” And I was stunned by how much Hayden managed to say without, seemingly, saying anything at all-he could bring forth joy and agony without literally writing the words, which formed as pic tures and not slogans. Hayden imagined the enslaved, dur ing the Middle Passage, from the perspective of the enslavers-a mind-trip for me, in and of itself; why should the enslaver be allowed to speak? But Hayden’s poems did not speak. They conjured:

You cannot stare that hatred down

or chain thefear that stalks the watches

I was not in any slave ship. Or perhaps I was, because so much of what I’d felt in Baltimore, the sharp hatred, the immortal wish, and the timeless will, I saw in Hayden’s work. And that was what I heard in Malcolm, but never like this-quiet, pure, and unadorned. I was learning the craft of poetry, which really was an intensive version of what my mother had taught me all those years ago-the craft of writing as the art of thinking. Poetry aims for an economy of truth-loose and useless words must be dis carded, and I found that these loose and useless words were not separate from loose and useless thoughts. Poetry was not simply the transcription of notions-beautiful writing rarely is. I wanted to learn to write, which was ultimately, still, as my mother had taught me, a confrontation with my own innocence, my own rationalizations. Poetry was the

processing ofmy thoughts until the slag ofjustification fell away and I was left with the cold steel truths oflife.

These truths I heard in the works of other poets around the city. They were made of small hard things-aunts and uncles, smoke breaks after sex, girls on stoops drinking from mason jars. These truths carried the black body be yond slogans and gave it color and texture and thus re flected the spectrum I saw out on theYard more than al of my alliterative talk of guns or revolutions or paeans to the lost dynasties ofAfrican antiquity. After these readings, I followed as the poets would stand out on U Street or re pair to a care and argue about everything-books, politics, boxing. And their arguments reinforced the discordant tradition I’d found in Moorland, and I began to see dis cord, argument, chaos, perhaps even fear, as a kind of power. I was learning to live in the disquiet I felt in Moorland-Spingarn, in the mess of my mind. The gnaw ing discomfort, the chaos, the intellectual vertigo was not an alarm. It was a beacon.

It began to strike me that the point ofmy education was

a kind of discomfort, was the process that would not award me my own especial Dream but would break al the dreams, al the comforting myths ofAfrica, ofAmerica, and everywhere, and would leave me only with humanity in al its terribleness. And there was so much terrible out there, even among us. You must understand this.

Back then, I knew, for instance, that just outside of Washington, D.C., there was a great enclave ofblack peo-

pie who seemed, as much as anyone, to have seized control oftheir bodies. This enclave was Prince George’s County “PG County” to the locals-and it was, to my eyes, very rich. Its residents had the same homes, with the same backyards, with the same bathrooms, I’d seen in those tele vised dispatches. They were black people who elected their own politicians, but these politicians, I learned, su perintended a police force as vicious as any in America. I had heard stories about PG County from the same poets who opened my world. These poets assured me that the PG County police were not police at al but privateers, gangsters, gump.en, plunderers operating under the color oflaw. They told me this because they wanted to protect my body. But there was another lesson here: To be black and beautiful was not a matter for gloating. Being black did not immunize us from history’s logic or the lure of the Dream. The writer, and that was what I was becoming, must be wary of every Dream and every nation, even his own nation. Perhaps his own nation more than any other, precisely because it was his own.

I began to feel that something more than a national trophy case was needed if I was to be truly free, and for that I have the history department of Howard University to thank. My history professors thought nothing of telling me that my search for myth was doomed, that the stories I wanted to tell myself could not be matched to truths. In deed, they felt it their duty to disabuse me ofmy weapon ized history. They had seen so many Malcolmites before

and were ready. Their method was rough and direct. Did black skin really convey nobility? Always? Yes. What about the blacks who’d practiced slavery for millennia and sold slaves across the Sahara and then across the sea? Victims ofa trick. Would those be the same black kings who birthed all of civilization? Were they then both deposed masters of the galaxy and gullible puppets all at once? And what did I mean by “black”? You know, black. Did I think this a time less category stretching into the deep past? Yes? Could it be supposed that simply because color was important to me, it had always been so?

I remember taking a survey class focusing on Central Africa. My professor, Linda Heywood, was slight and be spectacled, spoke with a high Trinidadian lilt that she em ployed like a hammer against young students like me who confused agitprop with hard study. There was nothing romantic about her Africa, or rather, there was nothing romantic in the sense that I conceived of it. And she took it back to the legacy of Queen Nzinga-my Tolstoy-the very same Nzinga whose life I wished to put in my trophy case. But when she told the story of Nzinga conducting negotiations upon the woman’s back, she told it without any fantastic gloss, and it hit me hard as a sucker punch: Among the people in that room, all those centuries ago, my body, breakable at wil, endangered in the streets, fear ful in the schools, was not closest to the queen’s but to her adviser’s, who’d been broken down into a chair so that a queen, heir to everything she’d ever seen, could sit.

I took a survey ofEurope post-1800. I saw black people, rendered through “white” eyes, unlike any I’d seen before-the black people looked regal and human. I re member the soft face of Alessandro de’ Medici, the royal bearing of Bosch’s black magi. These images, cast in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, were contrasted with those created after enslavement, the Samba caricatures I

had always known. What ::vas the difference? In my survey

course ofAmerica, I’d seen portraits of the Irish drawn in the same ravenous, lustful, and simian way. Perhaps there had been other bodies, mocked, terrorized, and insecure. Perhaps the Irish too had once lost their bodies. Perhaps being named “black” had nothing to do with any of this; perhaps being named “black” was just someone’s name for being at the bottom, a human turned to object, object turned to pariah.

This heap of realizations was a weight. I found them physically painful and exhausting. True, I was coming to enjoy the dizziness, the vertigo that must come with any odyssey. But in those early moments, the unceasing con tradictions sent me into a gloom. There was nothing holy or particular.in my skin; I was black because ofhistory and heritage. There was no nobility in falling, in being bound,

in living oppressed, and there was no inherent meaning in black blood. Black blood wasn’t black; black skin wasn’t

even black. And now I looked back on my need for a tro phy case, on the desire to live by the standards of Saul Bel low, and I felt that this need was not an escape but fear

again-fear that “they;’ the alleged authors and heirs ofthe universe, were right. And this fear ran so deep that we ac cepted their standards of civilization and humanity.

But not all of us. It must have been around that time that I discovered an essay by Ralph Wiley in which he responded to Bellow’s quip. “Tolstoy is the Tolstoy of the Zulus,” wrote Wiley. “Unless you find a profit in fencing off universal properties of mankind into exclusive tribal ownership.” And there it was. I had accepted Bellow’s premise. In fact, Bellow was no closer to Tolstoy than I was to Nzinga. And if I were closer it would be because I chose to be, not because of destiny written in DNA. My great error was not that I had accepted someone else’s dream but that I had accepted the fact of dreams, the need for escape, and the invention ofracecraft.

And still and all I knew that we were something, that we were a tribe-on one hand, invented, and on the .other, no less real. The reality was out there on theYard, on the first warm day ofspring when it seemed that every sector, bor ough, affiliation, county, and corner of the broad diaspora had sent a delegate to the great world party. I remember those days like an OutKast song, painted in lust andjoy. A baldhead in shades and a tank top stands across from Black burn, the student center, with a long boa draping his mus cular shoulders. A conscious woman, in stonewash with her dreads pulled back, is giving him the side-eye and laughing. I am standing outside the library debating the Republican takeover ofCongress or the place ofWu-Tang

Clan in the canon. A dude in a TribeVibe T-shirt walks up, gives a pound, and we talk about the black bacchanals of the season-Freaknik, Daytona, Virginia Beach—‘and we wonder if this is the year we make the trip. It isn’t. Because we have al we need out on the Yard. We are dazed here because we still remember the hot cities in which we were born, where the first days of spring were laced with fear. And now, here at The Mecca, we are without fear, we are

the dark spectrum on parade.

These were my first days of adulthood, of living alone, of cooking for my self, of going and coming as I pleased, of my own room, of the chance of returning there, perhaps, with one of those beautiful women who were now every where around me. In my second year at Howard, I fell hard for a lovely girl from California who was then in the habit offloating over the campus in a long skirt and head wrap. I remember her large brown eyes, her broad mouth and cool voice. I would see her out on theYard on those spring day s, yell her name and then throw up my hands as though signaling a touchdown-but wider-like the “W” in “What up?”That was how we did it then. Her father was from Bangalore, and where was that? And what were the laws out there? I did not yet understand the import of my own questions. What I remember is my ignorance. I re

member watching her eat with her hands and feeling wholly uncivilized with my fork. I remember wondering why she wore so many scarves. I remember her going to India for spring break and returning with a bindi on her

head and photos of her smiling Indian cousins. I told her, “Nigga, you black” because that’s all I had back then. But her beauty aud stillness broke the balance in me. In my small apartment, she kissed me, aud the ground opened up, swallowed me, buried me right there in that moment. How many awful poems did I write thinking of her? I know now what she was to me-the first glimpse of a space-bridge, a wormhole, a galactic portal off this bound and blind planet. She had seen other worlds, and she held the lineage of other worlds, spectacularly, in the vessel of her black body.

I fell again, a short time later and in similar fashion, for another girl, tall with long flowing dreadlocks. She was raised by a Jewish mother in a small, nearly all-white town in Pennsylvania, and now, at Howard, ranged between

women and men, asserted this not just with pride but as though it were normal, as though she were normal. I know it’s nothing to you now, but I was from a place-America where cruelty toward humans who loved as their deepest

instincts instructed was a kind of law. I was amazed. This was something black people did? Yes. And they did so much more. The girl with the long dreads lived in a house with a man, a Howard professor, who was married to a white woman. The Howard professor slept with men. His wife slept with women. And the two of them slept with each other. They had a little boy who must be off to col lege by now. “Faggot” was a word I had employed all my life. And now here they were,The Cabal,The Coven,The

Others, The Monsters, The Outsiders, The Faggots, The Dykes, dressed in all their human clothes. I am black, and have been plundered and have lost my body. But perhaps I too had the capacity for plunder, maybe I would take an other human’s body to confirm myself in a community. Perhaps I already had. Hate gives identity. The nigger, the fag, the bitch illuminate the border, illuminate what we ostensibly are not, illuminate the Dream ofbeing white, of being a Man. We name the hated strangers and are thus confirmed in the tribe. But my tribe was shattering and reforming around me. I saw these people often, because they were family to someone whom I loved. Their or dinary moments—answering the door, cooking in the kitchen, dancing to Adina Howard–ssaulted me and ex panded my notion of the human spectrum. I would sit in the living room of that house, observing their private jokes, one part ofme judging them, the other reeling from the changes.

She taught me to love in new ways. In my old house

your grandparents ruled with the fearsome rod. I have tried to address you differently—an idea begun by seeing all the other ways of!ove on display atThe Mecca. Here is how it started: I woke up one morning with a minor headache. With each hour the headache grew. I was walk ing to my job when I saw this girl on her way to class. I looked awful, and she gave me some Advil and kept going. By mid-afternoon I could barely stand. I called my super visor. When he arrived I lay down in the stockroom, be-

cause I had no idea what else to do. I was afraid. I did not understand what was happening. I did not know whom to call. I was lying there simmering, half-awake, hoping to recover. My supervisor knocked on the door. Someone had come to see me. It was her. The girl with the long dreads helped me out and onto the street. She flagged down a cab. Halfway through the ride, I opened the door, with the cab in motion, and vomited in the street. But I remember her holding me there to make sure I didn’t fall out and then holding me close when I was done. She took me to that house of humans, which was filed with all

manner oflove, put me in the bed, put Exodus on the CD

player, and turned the volume down to a whisper. She left a bucket by the bed. She left a jug of water. She had to go to class. I slept. When she returned I was back in form. We ate. The girl with the long dreads who slept with whom ever she chose, that being her own declaration of control over her body, was there. I grew up in a house drawn be tween love and fear. There was no room for softness. But this girl with the long dreads revealed something else that love could be soft and understanding; that, soft or hard, love was an act ofheroism.

And I could no longer predict where I would find my heroes. Sometimes I would walk with friends down to U Street and hang out at the local clubs. This was the era of Bad Boy and Biggie, “One More Chance” and “Hypno tize.” I almost never danced, as m.uch as I wanted to. I was crippled by some childhood fear of my own body. But I

would watch how black people moved, how in these clubs they danced as though their bodies could do anything, and their bodies seemed as free as Malcolm’s voice. On the outside black people controlled nothing, least of all the fate of their bodies, which could be commandeered by the police; which could be erased by the guns, which were so profligate; which could be raped, beaten, jailed. But in the clubs, under the influence of two-for-one rum and Cokes, under the spell of low lights, in thrall of hip-hop music, I felt them to be in total control of every step, every nod, every pivot.

Al I then wanted was to write as those black people danced, with control, power,joy, warmth. I was in and out ofclasses at Howard. I felt that it was time to go, to declare myself a graduate of The Mecca, ifnot the university. I was publishing music reviews, articles, and essays in the local alternative newspaper, and this meant contact with more human beings. I had editors-more teachers-and these were the first white people I’d ever really known on any personal level. They defied my presumptions-they were afraid neither for me nor of me. Instead they saw in my unruly curiosity and softness something that was to be treasured and harnessed. And they gave me the art ofjour nalism, a powerful technology for seekers. I reported on local D.C., and I found that people would tell me things, that the same softness that once made me a target now compelled people to trust me with their stories. This was incredible. I was barely out of the fog of childhood, where

questions simply died in my head. Now I could call and ask people why a popular store closed, why a show had been canceled, why there were so many churches and so few supermarkets.Journalism gave me another tool of ex ploration, another way of unveiling the laws that bound my body. It was beginning to come together-even if I could not yet see what the “it” was.

In Moorland I could explore the histories and tradi tions. Out on the Yard, I could see these traditions in ef fect. And with journalism, I could directly ask people about the two-r about anything else I might wonder. So much of my life was defined by not knowing. Why did I live in a world where teenage boys stood in the parking lot of the 7-Eleven pulling out? Why was it normal for my father, like all the parents I knew; to reach for his belt? And why was life so different out there, in that other world past the asteroids? What did the people whose images were once beamed into my living room have that I did not?

The girl with the long dreads who changed me, whom I so wanted to love, she loved a boy about whom I think every day and about whom I expect to think every day for the rest ofmy life. I think sometimes that he was an inven tion, and in some ways he is, because when the young are killed, they are haloed by all that was possible, all that was plundered. But I know that I had love for this boy, Prince Jones, which is to say that I would smile whenever I saw him, for I felt the warmth when I was around him and was slightly sad when the time came to trade clap and for one

of us to go. The thing to understand about Prince Jones is that he exhibited the whole of his given name. He was handsome. He was tall and brown, built thin and powerful like a wide receiver. He was the son of a prominent doctor. He was born-again, a state I did not share but respected. He was kind. Generosity radiated off of him, and he seemed to have a facility with ever yone and everything. This can never be true, but there are people who pull the

illusion off without effort, and Prince was one of them. I can only say what I saw, what I felt. There are people whom we do not fully know, and yet they live in a warm place within us, and when they are plundered, when they lose their bodies and the dark energy disperses, that place becomes a wound.

I fell in love at The Mecca one last time, lost my balance and all my boyhood confusion, under the spell of a girl from Chicago. This was your mother. I see us standing there with a group of friends in the living room of her home. I stood with a blunt in one hand and a beer in an other. I inhaled, passed it offto this Chicago girl, and when I brushed her long elegant fingers, I shuddered a bit from the blast. She brought the blunt to her plum-painted lips,

pulled, exhaled, then pulled the smoke back in. A week earlier I had kissed her, and now, watching this display of smoke and flame (and already feeling the effects), I was lost and running and wondering what it must be to embrace

her, to be exhaled by her, to return to her, and leave her high.

She had never knowri her father, which put her in the company of the greater number of everyone I’d known. I felt then that these men-these “fathers”-were the great est of cowards. But I also felt that the galaxy was playing with loaded dice, which ensured an excess of cowards in our ranks. The girl from Chicago understood this too, and she understood something more-that all are not equally robbed of their bodies, that the bodies of women are set out for pillage in ways I could never truly know. And she was the kind of black girl who’d been told as a child that she had better be smart because her looks wouldn’t save her, and then told as a young woman thanhe was really pretty for a dark-skinned girl. And so there was, all about her, a knowledge ofcosmic injustices, the same knowledge I’d glimpsed all those years ago watching my father reach for his belt, watching the suburban dispatches in my living room, watching the golden-haired boys with their toy

trucks and football cards, and dimly perceiving the great barrier betwee;,_ the world and me.

Nothing between· us was ever planned-not even you. We were both twenty-four years old when you were born, the normal age for most Americans, but among the class we soon found ourselves, we ranked as teenage par ents. With a whiff of fear, we were very often asked if we planned to marry. Marriage was presented to us as a shield against other women, other men, or the corrosive monot-

ony of dirty socks and dishwashing. But your mother and I knew too many people who’d married and abandoned each other for less. The truth of us was always that you were our ring. We’d summoned you out of ourselves, and you were not given a vote. If only for that reason, you de served all the protection we could muster. Everything else was subordinate to this fact. If that sounds like a weight, it shouldn’t. The truth is that I owe you everything I have. Before you, I had my questions but nothing beyond my own skin in the game, and that was really nothing at all because I was a young man, and not yet clear ofmy own human vulnerabilities. But I was grounded and domesti cated by the plain fact that should I now go down, I would not go down alone.

This is what I told myself, at least. It was comforting to believe that the fate ofmy body and the bodies ofmy fam ily were under my powers. “You will have to man up,” we tell our sons. “Anyone can make a baby, but it takes a man to be a father.”This is what they had told me all my life. It was the language of survival, a myth that helped us cope with the human sacrifice that finds us no matter our man hood. As though our hands were ever our own. & though plunder ofdark energy was not at the heart of our galaxy. And the plunder was there, if I wished to see it.

One summer, I traveled out to Chicago to see your mother. I rode down the Dan Ryan with friends and be held, for the first time, the State Street Corridor-a four mile stretch of dilapidated public housing. There were

projects all over Baltimore, but nothing so expansive as this. The housing occurred to me as a moral disaster not just for the people living there but for the entire region, the metropolis of commuters who drove by, each day, and with their quiet acquiescence tolerated such a thing. But there was so much more there in those projects than I was, even in al my curiosity, prepared to see.

Your maternal grandmother once visited us during the

pregnancy. She must have been horrified. We were living in Delaware. We had almost no furniture. I had left How ard without a degree and was living on the impoverished wages of a freelance writer. On the last day of her visit, I drove your grandmother to the airport. Your mother was her only child, as you are my only child. And having watched you grow, I know that nothing could possibly be more precious to her. She said to me, “You take care ofmy daughter.” When she got out of the car, my world had shifted. I felt that I had crossed some threshold, out of the foyer ofmy life and into the living room. Everything that was the past seemed to be another life. There was before you, and then there was after, and in this after, you were the God I’d never had. I submitted before your needs, and I knew then that I must survive for something more than survival’s sake. I must survive for you.

You were born that August. I thought ofthe great spec trum of The . Mecca-black people from Belize, black

people with Jewish. mothers, black people with fathers from Bangalore, black people from Toronto and Kingston,

black people who spoke Russian, who spoke Spanish, who played Mongo Santamaria, who understood mathematics and sat up in bone labs, uneatthing the mysteries of the enslaved. There was more out there than I had ever hoped for, and I wanted you to have it. I wanted you to know that the world in its entirety could never be found in the schools, alone, nor on the streets, alone, nor in the trophy case. I wanted you to claim the whole world, as it is. I wanted “Tolstoy is the Tolstoy of the Zulus” to immedi ately be obvious to you. And yet even in this cosmopolitan wish I felt the old power of ancestry, because I had come

to knowledge atThe Mecca that my ancestors made, and I

was compelle.d toward The Mecca by the struggle that my ancestors made.

The Struggle is in your name, Samori-you were named for Samori Toure, who struggled against French colonizers for the right to his own black body. He died in captivity, but the profits of that struggle and others like it are ours, even when the object of our struggle, as is so

often true, escapes our grasp. I learned this living among a people whom I would never have chosen, because the privileges of being black are not always self-evident. We are, as Derrick Bell once wrote, the “faces at the bottom of the well.” But there really is wisdom down here, and that wisdom accounts for much of the good in my life. And my life down here accounts for you.

There was also wisdom in those streets. I think now of the old rule that held that should a boy be set upon in

someone else’s chancy hood, his friends must stand with him, and they must all take their beating together. I now know that within this edict lay the key to al living. None of us were promised to end the fight on our feet, fists raised to the sky. We could not control our enemies’ num ber, strength, nor weaponry. Sometimes you just caught a bad one. But whether you fought or ran, you did it to gether, because that is the part that was in our control. What we must never do is wilgly hand over our own bodies or the bodies of our friends. That was the wisdom: We knew we did not lay down the direction of the street, but despite that, we could-d must-fashion the way of our walk. And that is the deeper meaning ofyour name that the struggle, in and of itself, has meaning.

That wisdom is not unique to our people, but I think it has special meaning to those of us born out of mass rape, whose ancestors were carried offand divided up into pol icies and stocks. I have raised you to respect every human being as singular, and you must extend that same respect into the past. Slavery is not an indefinable mass of flesh. It is a particular, specific enslaved woman, whose mind is ac tive as your own, whose range of feeling is as vast as your own; who prefers the way the light fal in one particular spot in the woods, who enjoys fishing where the water

eddies in a nearby stream, who loves her mother in her own complicated way, thinks her sister talks too loud, has a favorite cousin, a favorite season, who excels at dress making and knows, inside herself, that she is as intelligent

and capable as anyone. “Slavery” is this same woman born in a world that loudly proclaims its love of freedom and inscribes this love in its essential texts, a world in which these same professors hold this woman a slave, hold her mother a slave, her father a slave, her daughter a slave, and when this woman peers back into the generations all she sees is the enslaved. She can hope for more. She can imag ine some future for her grandchildren. But when she dies, the world-which is really the only world she can ever know-ends. For this woman, enslavement is not a parable. It is damnation. It is the never-ending night. And the length of that night is most of our history. Never forget that we were enslaved in this country longer than we have been free. Never forget that for 250 years black people

were born into chains-whole generations followed by

more generations who knew nothing but chains.

You must struggle to truly remember this past in all its nuance, error, and humanity. You must resist the common urge toward the comforting narrative ofdivine law, toward fairy tales that imply some irrepressible justice. The en slaved were not bricks in your road, and their lives were not chapters in ·your redemptive history. They were peo ple turned to fuel for the American machine. Enslavement was not destined to end, and it is wrong to claim our pres ent circumstance-no matter how improved-as the re demption for the lives of people who never asked for the posthumous, untouchable glory of dying for their chil dren. Our triumphs can never compensate for this. Perhaps

our triumphs are not even the point. Perhaps struggle is al we have because the god ofhistory is an atheist, and noth ing about his world is meant to be. So you must wake up every morning knowing that no promise is unbreakable, least of al the promise ofwaking up at al. This is not de spair. These are the preferences of the universe itself: verbs over nouns, actions over states, struggle over hope.

The birth of a better world is not ultimately up to yon, though I know, each day, there are grown men and women who tell you otherwise. The world needs saving precisely because ofthe actions of these same men and women. I am not a cynic. I love you, and I love the world, and I love it more with every new inch I discover. But you are a black boy, and you must be responsible for your body in a way that other boys cannot know. Indeed, you must be respon sible for the worst actions of other black bodies, which, somehow, will always be assigned to you. And you must be responsible for the bodies of the powerful-the policeman who cracks you with a nightstick wil quickly find his ex cuse in your furtive movements. And this is not reducible to just you-the women around you must be responsible for their bodies in a way that you never will know. You have to make your peace with the chaos, but you cannot lie. You cannot forget how much they took from us and how they transfigured our very bodies into sugar, tobacco, cotton, and gold.