Ty turned Bishopโs words over in his mind.
โYouโre wrong,โ he mumbled, still lost in thought. โExcuse me?โ Bishop said.
โI believe youโre right about what the files areโjust not what they do. As I said, I agree that the first file is a machine. And that the others are genomes, but I donโt think weโre meant to print them. Weโre not supposed to create humans from whatโs being sent.โ
โAnd what do you base thatย speculationย upon?โ Bishop asked.
โGut instinct. Whoever is on the other side of the quantum radio is clearly more advanced than us. They wouldnโt just fax over some representatives. First of all, a printed human wouldnโt have any memories
โโ
โThat may not be true,โ Helen said. Ty glanced at his mother, who continued. โWe now know that DNA can encode memoriesโor at least the shape of them.
A research project in Europe called MemoTVโwhich studies epigenetic, neural, and cognitive memories of traumatic stress and violenceโfound that trauma experienced by mothers affects early offspring development. In fact, the DNA alterations are actually encoded and passed on to future generations. If trauma can alter the DNA of our children, itโs plausible that other, more specific memories could be encoded.โ
Bishop spoke before Ty could respond. โThereโs also the obvious: these humans could have advancements that arenโt evident in a simple review of the genome. After all, if you compare a Neanderthal genome with one of our genomes, youโd find thereโs onlyโฆโ Bishop looked over at Helen. โHow much difference?โ
โWe share roughly 99.7 percent of our genome with Neanderthals. Even chimpanzees have 98.8 percent of our DNA.โ
โExactly,โ Bishop said. โAnd look at the massive differences those small DNA changes make. For all we know, these humans they want us to print will be a completely different subspecies. They may be capable of things we canโt even imagine.โ
โYes,โ Ty said, nodding. โEven more reason not to print them. For all we know, they could be an invasion force. Granted, there are only four of them, but based on what youโre saying, it would be dangerous.โ
โPrecisely why we plan to do the printing on an aircraft carrier in the Pacific surrounded by a fleet of nuclear submarines with multiple warheads trained on it.โ
Ty let his head fall back. โItโs a bad plan based on the wrong assumptions.โ
โWell, what are your assumptions?โ
โThat whoever is broadcasting is trying to communicate with us. Think about it. They can only broadcast now. The first broadcast, logically, would give us the details of how to build a device that lets us broadcast back.โ
Bishop pointed at Ty. โNow on that, we agree. And thatโsย howย we think these humans are different. We believe that they have the innate ability to receive the quantum broadcastsโthat the subatomic particles being detected by the LHC at CERN actually have an effect on the neurons in the brains of these new humans. Our working theory is that they are genetically capable of receiving quantum broadcasts, relaying them to us and sending return messages, perhaps thanks to entangled particles in their brains. As I said, they are representatives. A communication conduit.โ
Ty shook his head. โItโs wrong. Itโs the right idea, but youโre wrong on the specifics.โ
Bishop snorted. โYou canโt just say itโs wrong and leave it at that.โ He turned to Richter. โThis is what I meanโwe have to move forward here. This is not some academic seminar where you debate and nothing happens. We need to act.โ
Richter focused on Ty. โTell him what you think the files are.โ
โAs I said, the first file is, in fact, a machine. And yes, I think itโs a device we can use to communicate with the broadcaster. Which makes it obvious what it is.โ
Bishop shrugged, clearly annoyed. โDo tell.โ
โItโs a collider. After all, thatโs what we detected the broadcast with. But if my guess is right, this collider is more advancedโand much smaller.โ
Bishop chuckled. โRightโฆโ
โWhy do you think itโs smaller?โ Helen asked.
โLogically, it would be. Advancements in technology almost always feature miniaturization.โ
Ty had always been fascinated with the history of computing and how far it had come so fast. The historical facts were lodged in his mind, and they came rapid-fire now. โLook at history: one of the first programmable, electronic digital computers, the ENIAC, took up roughly one thousand eight hundred square feet and used about eighteen thousand vacuum tubes. It weighed sixty thousand pounds. The ENIAC could do around three hundred eighty five multiplication operations per second. That was way back in 1946. Today, the average smartphone weighs less than a pound and the processor can doย trillionsย of operations per second. To put it simply, making technology smaller is the natural arc of innovation. Thereโs another reason to make the device smaller: it makes it easier to hide and transport. Immovable objects are inherently more difficult to defend.โ
Bishop looked skeptical. โItโs one thing to shrink a computer, but a particle collider? I donโt buy it.โ
โItโs already happening,โ Ty said.
โWhat do you mean?โ Bishop asked.
โA few years ago, a team of researchers at Imperial College London described a way to accelerate particles using common equipment present in most physics labsโin a much smaller space. Weโre talking about a system that would be just a few centimeters long.โ
โThey have a prototype?โ Bishop asked.
โNot as far as I know. The work right now is just in simulations and computer models, but the principles are sound. They still need a large laser, which would occupy maybe three hundred square feet, but their collider would actually create exotic particles at a faster rate than the LHC.โ
โWell,โ Bishop said, โwhat youโre saying is all hypothetical, and weโll know what the device actually is soon enough.โ
โWhat about the genomes?โ Richter asked, nodding toward Ty.
โIf Iโm right,โ Ty said carefully, โthe genomes arenโt of any alien representatives. Theyโre of people already here on Earth.โ